Adega de Palmela
Moscatel de Setúbal - 10 Anos • Non-vintage
Orange • Still (Sweet)
DO Setúbal • Moscatel de Setúbal (Península de Setúbal, Portugal)
Dominant aromas
walnut, cashew nut
sun-drenched, muscaty
Main characteristics
Slightly intense
Very intense
Very intense
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
13
(76%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
4
(24%)
Qualitative summary
Expressiveness
Moderately described
Non-consensual quality
Poor
1
/8
13
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
2
/8
25
%
Not described
5
/8
63
%
Most used descriptors
important
2
slightly important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Balance
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
3
/8
38
%
Not described
5
/8
63
%
Most used descriptors
important
2
very nice balance
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Freshness
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
2
/8
25
%
Not described
6
/8
75
%
Most used descriptors
important
1
present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Alcohol
Seldom described
Rather low quality
Poor
1
/8
13
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
0
/8
0
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Most used descriptors
excessive
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Evolution
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Most used descriptors
elegant / pleasant
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Lightness
Seldom described
Rather low quality
Poor
1
/8
13
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
0
/8
0
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Most used descriptors
excessive
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Salinity
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Most used descriptors
present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Length
Seldom described
Rather low quality
Poor
1
/8
13
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
0
/8
0
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Most used descriptors
slightly important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Unctuousness
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Overall quality
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Most used descriptors
slightly typical
1
round / coated
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Breadth
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Bitterness
Seldom described
Non-consensual quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
1
/8
13
%
Good
0
/8
0
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Most used descriptors
present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
-
PNGStandard
-
PNG HDHigh definition
-
SVGVector file
Taste profile
-
PNGStandard
-
PNG HDHigh definition
-
SVGVector file
Most commented characteristics
Expressiveness
Moderately described
Intensity and quality
Intensity
Low
1
/8
13
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
2
/8
25
%
Not described
5
/8
63
%
Quality
Poor
1
/8
13
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
2
/8
25
%
Not described
5
/8
63
%
Balance
Moderately described
Intensity and quality
Intensity
Low
0
/8
0
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
3
/8
38
%
Not described
5
/8
63
%
Quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
3
/8
38
%
Not described
5
/8
63
%
Freshness
Moderately described
Intensity and quality
Intensity
Low
0
/8
0
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
2
/8
25
%
Not described
6
/8
75
%
Quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
2
/8
25
%
Not described
6
/8
75
%
Residual sugar
Moderately described
Quality only
Intensity
Low
1
/8
13
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
1
/8
13
%
Not described
6
/8
75
%
Alcohol
Moderately described
Mainly intensity
Intensity
Low
0
/8
0
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
2
/8
25
%
Not described
6
/8
75
%
Quality
Poor
1
/8
13
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
0
/8
0
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Evolution
Seldom described
Intensity and quality
Intensity
Low
0
/8
0
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Lightness
Seldom described
Intensity and quality
Intensity
Low
0
/8
0
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Quality
Poor
1
/8
13
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
0
/8
0
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Salinity
Seldom described
Intensity and quality
Intensity
Low
0
/8
0
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Length
Seldom described
Intensity and quality
Intensity
Low
1
/8
13
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
0
/8
0
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Quality
Poor
1
/8
13
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
0
/8
0
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Unctuousness
Seldom described
Intensity and quality
Intensity
Low
0
/8
0
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Sweetness
Seldom described
Quality only
Intensity
Low
1
/8
13
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
0
/8
0
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Overall quality
Seldom described
Intensity only
Quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Breadth
Seldom described
Intensity and quality
Intensity
Low
0
/8
0
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
0
/8
0
%
Good
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Bitterness
Seldom described
Intensity and quality
Intensity
Low
0
/8
0
%
Medium
0
/8
0
%
High
1
/8
13
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
Quality
Poor
0
/8
0
%
Average
1
/8
13
%
Good
0
/8
0
%
Not described
7
/8
88
%
See more
Score analyses
/100
0
Min
61.5
Average
91
Max
Total comments
8
Comments with score
4 (50%)
Median
77.5
Number of favorites
0
The number of comments with scores is relatively low
Data analyzed by
Winespace