Winespace
Winespace
Report "Demo"
Created on 2025-07-21
By Winespace
cuvee bottle image
Adega de Palmela
Moscatel de Setúbal - 10 Anos • Non-vintage
Orange • Still (Sweet)
DO Setúbal • Moscatel de Setúbal (Península de Setúbal, Portugal)
Dominant aromas
Main characteristics
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
13
(81%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
3
(19%)
Qualitative summary
Expressiveness
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
3 /8
High quality
2 /8
Low quality
1 /8
25%
13%
Most used descriptors
Important
2
Slightly important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Balance
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
3 /8
High quality
3 /8
Low quality
0 /8
38%
0%
Most used descriptors
Important
2
Very nice balance
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Freshness
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
2 /8
High quality
2 /8
Low quality
0 /8
25%
0%
Most used descriptors
Important
1
Present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Unctuousness
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
1 /8
Low quality
0 /8
13%
0%
Most used descriptors
Important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Length
Seldom described
Rather low quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
0 /8
Low quality
1 /8
0%
13%
Most used descriptors
Slightly important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Breadth
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
1 /8
Low quality
0 /8
13%
0%
Most used descriptors
Important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Overall quality
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
1 /8
Low quality
0 /8
13%
0%
Most used descriptors
Round / coated
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Salinity
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
1 /8
Low quality
0 /8
13%
0%
Most used descriptors
Present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Alcohol
Seldom described
Rather low quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
0 /8
Low quality
1 /8
0%
13%
Most used descriptors
Excessive
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Evolution
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
1 /8
Low quality
0 /8
13%
0%
Most used descriptors
Elegant / pleasant
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
Taste profile
Most commented characteristics
Balance
Moderately described
Intensity and quality

Intensity
Comments with average high or low intensity
3 /8
High intensity
3 /8
Low intensity
0 /8
38%
0%

Quality
Comments with average high or low quality
3 /8
High quality
3 /8
Low quality
0 /8
38%
0%
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Expressiveness
Moderately described
Intensity and quality

Intensity
Comments with average high or low intensity
3 /8
High intensity
2 /8
Low intensity
1 /8
25%
13%

Quality
Comments with average high or low quality
3 /8
High quality
2 /8
Low quality
1 /8
25%
13%
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Residual sugar
Moderately described
Quality only

Intensity
Comments with average high or low intensity
2 /8
High intensity
1 /8
Low intensity
1 /8
13%
13%
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Freshness
Moderately described
Intensity and quality

Intensity
Comments with average high or low intensity
2 /8
High intensity
2 /8
Low intensity
0 /8
25%
0%

Quality
Comments with average high or low quality
2 /8
High quality
2 /8
Low quality
0 /8
25%
0%
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Alcohol
Moderately described
Mainly intensity

Intensity
Comments with average high or low intensity
2 /8
High intensity
2 /8
Low intensity
0 /8
25%
0%

Quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
0 /8
Low quality
1 /8
0%
13%
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Evolution
Seldom described
Intensity and quality

Intensity
Comments with average high or low intensity
1 /8
High intensity
1 /8
Low intensity
0 /8
13%
0%

Quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
1 /8
Low quality
0 /8
13%
0%
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Bitterness
Seldom described
Quality only

Intensity
Comments with average high or low intensity
1 /8
High intensity
1 /8
Low intensity
0 /8
13%
0%
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Salinity
Seldom described
Intensity and quality

Intensity
Comments with average high or low intensity
1 /8
High intensity
1 /8
Low intensity
0 /8
13%
0%

Quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
1 /8
Low quality
0 /8
13%
0%
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Breadth
Seldom described
Intensity and quality

Intensity
Comments with average high or low intensity
1 /8
High intensity
1 /8
Low intensity
0 /8
13%
0%

Quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
1 /8
Low quality
0 /8
13%
0%
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Length
Seldom described
Intensity and quality

Intensity
Comments with average high or low intensity
1 /8
High intensity
0 /8
Low intensity
1 /8
0%
13%

Quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
0 /8
Low quality
1 /8
0%
13%
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Unctuousness
Seldom described
Intensity and quality

Intensity
Comments with average high or low intensity
1 /8
High intensity
1 /8
Low intensity
0 /8
13%
0%

Quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
1 /8
Low quality
0 /8
13%
0%
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Overall quality
Seldom described
Intensity only

Quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /8
High quality
1 /8
Low quality
0 /8
13%
0%
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Score analyses
/100
0

Min

61.5

Average

91

Max


Total comments
8
Comments with score
4 (50%)
Median
77.5
Number of favorites
0
The number of comments with scores is relatively low
Data analyzed by Winespace